A seminar in Delhi explores the role of young people in social transformation

NEW DELHI, India — India has the largest youth population in the world, a reality that holds both enormous promise and potential challenges for the country’s future.

Recently, the Indian Institute of Public Administration and the Public Affairs Office of the Bahá’ís of India organized a seminar at the India International Center on the subject of youth, entitled The Role of Youth in social transformation. Over 40 people attended the event on February 10, 2016, including representatives from civil society, government, media and faith-based organizations.

Young people are needed as leaders and decision-makers in spaces where the course and direction of society as a whole is determined. In examining this theme, the seminar looked specifically at young people in community development, the impact of media on young people and the contribution of young people to the fight against climate change.

“There is a need to include the voices of young people in a meaningful way,” said Farida Vahedi, a Baha’i who works as a youth empowerment and capacity building officer at City Montessori School in Lucknow and moderator of the Quality Education Forum of India.

Slideshow
4 pictures

Ms. Kiran Soni Gupta—Additional Secretary, Ministry of Youth and Sports, Government of India—delivers the keynote speech at the seminar on “The Role of Youth in Social Transformation” in New Delhi.

“Integrating young people into formal power structures is of course beneficial for a variety of reasons, but the mere fact of nurturing ‘young’ voices into ‘old’ systems, if not accompanied by of more substantial participation, risks degenerating into mere symbolism.”

Representing the Indian government, Kiran Soni Gupta, Deputy Secretary of the Ministry of Youth and Sports, agreed. “The concept of leadership needs to be redefined,” Ms Gupta said in her speech at the start of the day, setting the tone for the consultation that followed. “It is young people who can bring a new wave of ideas and innovation to society.”

This theme was the basis of the questions explored during the first panel, which addressed the role of young people in community development.

Following this, the second panel, which looked at the impact of media on young people, discussed the ways in which digital media can be harnessed to be used in positive ways, while being mindful of the negative ways in which it is currently used. .

Finally, the final panel, led by four people with a background in sustainability, looked at the contribution that young people can make to the issue of climate change, particularly in India – a growing society with the potential to change. have a significant impact on the environment. “Young people need to design new solutions to climate change,” said Tishyarakshit Chatterjee, director of the Indian Institute of Public Administration. “Solutions must emerge from young minds.”

In all of these areas, facilitating progress will require learning, building capacity, motivation and willpower, said Ms. Vahedi. To empower young people to become leaders, new systems for decision-making and collaboration must be developed. “Systems characterized by an unbiased search for truth, an attitude of cooperation and reciprocity, and an appreciation of the vital role each individual can play in the betterment of the whole.”

Pooja Tiwai, a young Baha’i from Delhi, spoke as a panelist on the contribution of young people to community building efforts. Speaking of her peers, she explained that they dream of a better world and want to contribute to social progress.

“Yet how to go about bringing about such change is a question they are grappling with,” she said. While there are many positive forces in society that can propel them in this direction, there are also many negative forces that set them back and become an obstacle to achieving the high ideals they hold dear. Hence the need for constructive programs capable of creatively channeling the energies of large numbers of young people.

This seminar was the second co-organized by the Indian Institute of Public Administration and the Office of Public Affairs of the Bahá’ís of India on the theme of youth in society.

The Ministry of Social Transformation seeks to inform the public about updated social programs

By Orville Williams

[email protected]

Following several significant adjustments to the country’s Social Welfare Act (2020), the Ministry of Social Transformation, Human Resource Development and Blue Economy is seeking to raise awareness among members of the public – especially those who have it. need – to a number of updated social protection programs. .

As its title suggests, the Welfare Act replaced the longstanding Poor Relief Act (1961) in September last year and now supports the less fortunate with food aid/ vouchers, funeral grants, a grant for fire victims, assistance for the homeless, home help for the elderly, and support for children, the disabled and the indigent.

The ministry announced these components in a press release yesterday, adding that “more are yet to come”, via funding from the United Nations International Emergency Fund (UNICEF) and major support from the government.

According to the Minister responsible for implementation, Dean Jonas, “changes to the law have been made to protect the vulnerable and indigent, [so] it is very important that our society understands and appreciates the necessary protection”.

These programs, according to the Ministry of Social Transformation, differ from those run under the old Poor Relief Act, which “focused primarily on individuals, with minimal investment in contributory schemes and providing assistance limited social assistance, such as the distribution of cash to the most deprived people”. to meet their basic needs. »

He insists that “vulnerability is much more than lack of money” and says the current law “represents what social protection policies and programs should be, an inclusive approach where everyone is covered and where everyone prospers”.

Alongside the programs, the ministry recalled that the creation of the Social Welfare Council and a Social Welfare Commission – to provide essential oversight and promote transparency – is another new component of the law, in line with the modernization of the social protection system.

The two bodies will be responsible for coordinating the operation of multi-sectoral social protection systems, covering non-contributory and contributory programs, labor market planning, poverty reduction and planning for the eventual extension of the social protection programme.

It could be otherwise: contingency and social transformation

Credit: www.Pixabay.com. Public domain CC0.

As an avid social theory reader and pedagogue, one question particularly interests me: what are the intellectual tools needed to examine the social world and think critically about its transformation? Although it may seem abstract at first, I think a particularly important idea is contingency.

To say that something is contingent means that “it could be otherwise” – it is not necessary or inevitable that it exists as it is. Everything in the social world is contingent. All the institutions we are part of, the standards we follow and the practices we adopt could all be different because they were created by human beings. They only stay the same because people keep acting the way they do. If it stopped, everything would change.

It can be a real mindf**k for young people. It was definitely for me, when I was first encouraged to consider it as a 16-year-old sociology student in London. The idea of ​​contingency helps overcome an important barrier to thinking and acting around transformation, which is the tendency to assume that the world around us is fixed, normal, or natural. This can foster a strong sense of possibility and empowerment, and make concrete change more plausible – essential seeds for any social movement. The idea of ​​societal contingency helped spark revolutions in the 18th and 19th centuries, when enough people stopped seeing their social order as divinely ordained.

In my work with groups of young people in Hackney, East London, I often show a video in which Steve Jobs, the ex-CEO of Apple, captures this point: “All you call life around of you was made up by people who aren’t smarter than you,” he says, “you can change it. Too often they are belittled in institutions and find themselves on the wrong side of prevailing social norms, so it can be liberating to think that these are human constructs that can be changed.

This basic understanding of contingency has value in galvanizing a sense of agency, but going deeper is essential if we are to think rigorously about social transformation. Jobs’ articulation is simplistic to the point of naivete, seeming to suggest that change is easy while ignoring interests, habits, structures, inertia and the kind of practical day-to-day necessities you rarely encounter if you’re a tech billionaire in Silicon Valley or Seattle.

Perhaps even more dangerously in terms of how we think about the social world, it also lumps together all that is humanly constructed as if it’s equally changeable, when it clearly isn’t. Gender, McDonalds, Ice Skates, and Cheese are all man-made, but they are not changeable in the same way, in the same timescale, or to the same extent.

Contingency is most fruitfully understood as a historical concept that can be used to examine specific features of the social world. To say something is historically contingent means that it could have happened differently from the beginning and could be very different in the future. It makes the social world less solid and less stable, drawing attention to the fact that all institutions, norms and practices were formed over time in particular places and through particular processes that did not have to be produce as they did – a way of thinking that has important consequences.

First, it challenges the idea of ​​an “End of History” that is fostered in some corners of neo-liberal thought – the notion that liberal democracy has triumphed and will ever more prevail. Challenging this idea is an important prerequisite for social change, because the image of an unchanging political order numbs resistance. In his study of social obedience and passivity, for example, sociologist Barrington Moore uses a series of historical cases to show how “at many times and in many places” the perception of a “permanent present” has been a powerfully conservative force in creating an atmosphere of passivity and quietude.

Second, thinking historically helps convey the fact that different features of the social world are contingent to different degrees and in different ways. When thinking about transformation, it’s essential to consider that what you value most might have been formed very differently over time, but it might also be disappearing. Along the same lines, what you despise most might be stubbornly persistent. Thinking in this way helps guard against complacency about what must be continually defended, acquiescence toward what must be continually challenged, and the inability to judge between the two, which is fundamental to any successful engagement in social and political activism. .

Take the UK’s National Health Service (NHS), for example. If you grew up seeing the NHS as an inescapable part of the British political make-up and an everyday institutional reality, it can be easy to see it as normal, pervasive and unchanging. But looking at the NHS through the prism of historical contingency – particularly at a time when it is under threat – shows that none of these things are true. And it helps to mobilize concerns and illuminate the possibilities ahead.

The NHS was born out of particular historical circumstances – created after a period of war which resulted in greater national solidarity; by a Labor government with strong popular support; at a time when the “forward march” of the broader labor movement seemed inexorable; and as part of a broader project of building a welfare state designed to guarantee basic well-being for all.

Even so, its birth and development was never easy or straightforward. The NHS initially faced stiff opposition from some doctors, and less than three years after its creation it was already being modified, moving further away from its founding principle of free healthcare for all. In 1951, Labor Chancellor Hugh Gaitskell introduced prescription charges for dental care and eyeglasses, upsetting Nye Bevan (the architect of the NHS) so much that he resigned as Minister of Labour. In his resignation speech, he dismissed those who called the matter “trivial”, saying: “Avalanches start with the movement of a very small stone…The pebble starts, but no one takes care of the pebble until until it progresses, and soon everyone the valley is submerged.

Given the increasing commodification of the NHS, it’s clear the ‘rocks’ have since been moving and an avalanche isn’t out of the question. At a time when many believe the public health system is being quietly dismantled, it is useful to recognize that the NHS has never been invulnerable: it has always had both forces weighed against it and people dedicated to defending her – the “people left with the faith to fight for her,” as Bevan so aptly put it.

This consideration of historical contingency is important for activists because it provides insight into the precariousness of the social institutions they want to protect or transform. Similar ideas have been deployed in current Brexit debates, especially in progressive circles. A fundamental difference between the Lexit and Another Europe campaigns is their divergent narratives of the historical contingency of the European Union. For Lexiters, the EU is and always will be a neoliberal club, and its history demonstrates that all alternative possibilities are minimal.

On the other hand, those who push for another Europe make a positive argument for its contingency. For them, the EU is a dynamic project that has evolved throughout its history, so that it can be transformed into a force for progressive action. Looking at the question through the prism of historical contingency doesn’t give you an answer, but it does help you think about what is fundamentally at stake.

Ideas about contingency are invoked in different ways in a wide range of political arguments. In social policy, for example, some argue that the nuclear family is a natural necessity to be adhered to, while others say it is contingent and should be modified or preserved. Anti-globalization protesters claim that capitalist expansion is not a historical inevitability but a contingent process that can be contested. And a cornerstone of critiques of contemporary gender norms is the idea that gender is a fluid social construct that depends on time, place, culture and ideology.

Understanding contingency can help us better critique political arguments, examine the social world more rigorously, and define our positions on crucial issues. The current social order did not arise by chance or necessity, and neither will those that will replace it in the future. It is up to us to discern what is more contingent and what is more resilient; judging what is worth defending and what needs to be challenged; and act on our decisions.

EMU educator creates “One Love Symposium” as vehicle for social transformation

What do doctors, teachers, and policemen need to know to be good at their jobs? This is the subject of a community symposium to be held next February in Ann Arbor.

WEMU’s Lisa Barry talks to event founder Dr. Anna Gersh about her idea.

TRANSCRIPTION:

Lisa Barry: Making a difference in the lives of others, and then in your community, is important to many people. This is Lisa Barry, and there is an educator, researcher, and project administrator from Eastern Michigan University who is hosting a special event called One Love Symposium. And here to tell us about it is Dr. Anna Gersh. Thanks for talking to us.

Dr. Anna Gersh: Thank you very much for having me, Lisa.

Lisa Barry: If there’s love in the name, I’m with it. So why not start by telling us what it’s all about?

Dr. Anna Gersh: Sure. The One Love Symposium kind of came to me at the start of the lockdown. I had been, like many people, quite disturbed by the previous administration. Lots of action. And then, when the murder of George Floyd happened, I found myself in front of the television crying about the news, like a little on a regular basis. And I realized that I was at home with my 15-year-old son and I was modeling fear. And, I mean, that’s it. You know, I just – that’s what it was. I had to do something real. I just couldn’t be another white woman crying that the world isn’t perfect. So I started to formulate some thoughts on what we might be able to do. And it occurred to me that after 17 years as a classroom teacher, and then the last four plus years, I’ve been working on efforts to improve police training, including being a member of the Mayor of Ann Arbor’s task force to create a police oversight commission. back in training in 2017. And then, now I’m a member of the Washtenaw County Sheriff’s Office Policing and Compliance Commission. I have thought a lot about the nature of human services and the fact that there is research to be done at the point of care. Thus, the overarching goal of the One Love Symposium is to develop an improving certification process for a variety of human service professions, including doctors, teachers, and law enforcement officers, which service point time. And the way we want to do that, the way, you know, I think is a really good way to engage people, is to engage in a public scholarship effort. So that means, you know, getting stakeholders, people who use public services, which is all of us, at all levels, to help create this body of information that will help those workers to improve in their work.

Lisa Barry: So who do you think is involved in all of this? Do you bring in people from all walks of life or from all professions?

Dr. Anna Gersh: Yeah, right now we’re starting that it’s kind of a three-phase process. It is a three-phase process. I have about 10 youth data collectors. I have spent the past few months participating in different school programs – virtually and in person – and talking to young people about contributing to this effort. So the idea is that we’re actually going to meet next week. We have two meetings next week, from the 10th to the 12th. It is difficult to say exactly who will show up because they are young people, and they have a lot of commitments and interests. But I think I have a pretty good team, and then we’re going to meet, and I’m going to train them on the research protocol associated with the city, which is the institutional review boards, you know , making sure to protect the people you research with. And they’re going to create, them and me, a survey tool that they’ll bring to the communities of their choosing. Go get that information, bring it back. We will put it together in a report. This report will be used to extract some discussion questions. And we’re going to use it to fuel a conversation that’s taking place at the Ann Arbor District Library on September 28, which will be a preview event. And there are training professionals, including Dr. Wendy Burke, who is the head of the teacher training department here at Eastern, Rebecca Guzman, who is a founding member of MICHWA, the Michigan Community Health Workers Alliance. And I’m crossing my fingers for Brandon Locke at the police academy at Washtenaw Community College. I’m meeting him next week, but he seems very interested. This conversation will be moderated by Dr. Michael Johnson, who is the Department Head at UMass Boston and Public Policy and Public Affairs. He’s going to facilitate a values-driven decision-making conversation, which is basically a fancy way of saying a good facilitator who is able to extract important points from interested parties to help build that body of information. So it’s really about bringing in people at all levels – young people, community members, academics, professionals – to put in place a community certification process, ultimately, and hope that it will be like a little thing of 30 hours that everyone can participate. So people like, you know, preschool teachers and brain surgeons, potentially have something to gain from this certification process.

Lisa Barry: So I hear you using words like data, research, and training. Yet it is called the One Love Symposium. Where does love come from in all this?

Dr. Anna Gersh: Well, you know, I guess that sounds… I don’t know. I don’t know what it looks like. I mean, it’s from a Bob Marley song. And, you know, it’s One Love, One Heart. You know, the idea that the social service professional deals with all of humanity is a concept of unity. And, you know, I think all the issues that arise in that moment of service where the social service professional – the doctor, the teacher, the policeman – are assessing what you need or should you be ignored or forgiven or punished. It is a moment that should be informed by the universal human values ​​that we all share. And so, that seemed like a good name for it.

Lisa Barry: So, the first stage arrives in September. And then what’s after that before the big event in February? This is how it works ?

Dr. Anna Gersh: Yeah. Mm hm. Thus, collecting data on young people during the summer. September is the kind of academic professional event. And then all of this information is going to feed into the love symposium, which will take place, in part, at the Blue LLama Jazz Club in February 2022. The specific date, we’re starting to work on that. But we have some, I’m starting to collect some. It will be more of a kind of celebratory occasion. There will be round tables, but, you know, so there will be an academic aspect, but there will also be an integrated artistic aspect. Marcus Elliot will be performing as part of this event and the great saxophonist… the young and brilliant saxophonist Marcus Elliott and who also hopes to attract other people. But we are in a process.

Lisa Barry: Speaking of this process, are you still looking for participants, or can everyone in the community participate at some point?

Dr. Anna Gersh: Yes, the September event will be both in-person and live. And there’s a teen writing contest, open to any young person from any district in Michigan, because it’s an online submission. But you need to submit to a registered teacher, so you can check this on a teen writing contest feature. Prize money and all submissions will be included in an anthology, which will be available for pre-sale to fund the pay features of this symposium. So kids can win cash prizes, participating teachers who will act as a verification level for kids’ essays or… it doesn’t have to be an essay. It can actually be anything. But, these teachers will also… there is a remuneration formula to be established for these teachers as well, and it is available on the site.

Lisa Barry: And what is the site? Where can people get more information?

Dr. Anna Gersh: One Love Symposium dot com.

Lisa Barry: And we will put that with a link to this interview on our website, WEMU dot org. Dr Anna Gersch. I hope you will let us register and follow the process for the next One Love Symposium which will be held right here in Washtenaw County. And we’ll get back to base and continue to be updated on what’s going on in all of this.

Dr. Anna Gersh: I look forward to this. Thank you.

Fact-based, non-commercial reporting is made possible through your financial support. Donate to WEMU today to ensure the prosperity of your community NPR station.

Like 89.1 WEMU on Facebook and follow us on Twitter

— Lisa Barry is the host of All Things Considered on WEMU. You can reach Lisa at 734.487.3363, on Twitter @LisaWEMUor email him at [email protected]

History | About | Creativity, Arts and Social Transformation (CAST) Program

Story

The concept of the Minor in Creativity, Arts and Social Transformation (CAST) was proposed by Dr Cynthia Cohen (pictured), Director of the Peacebuilding and Arts Program based at the International Center for Ethics, Justice and public life. Cohen’s initial ideas were discussed and reinforced by a group of students involved in his classes and projects. A preliminary proposal was reviewed and reinforced by many faculty members. The Brandeis faculty approved the minor in its current form in May 2014, and Jennifer Cleary of the Department of Theater Arts joined the advisory board as co-chair. The first students enrolled in fall 2014 and the introductory course was first taught in spring 2015.

CAST is governed by an advisory committee and is administratively hosted by the International Center for Ethics, Justice and Public Life. A student advisory committee was formed to help launch the minor and bring student perspectives to the development of the program.

With the generous support of the following donors, the minor has offered small grants to faculty and visiting lecturers and lecturers:

  • Amy Merrill ’68
  • Elaine Ruben ’63
  • The Max and Sunny Howard Memorial Foundation, with inspiration from Naomi Sinnreich P’13.
  • We also appreciate the support of Ammad Bahalim ’04, for his visionary funding of CAST 170a: Documenting Immigrant Experiences, which focused on the stories of immigrants from Muslim-majority countries.

Social transformation through female education

Proper education and edification can bring about changes in the concepts and behaviors of certain individuals, and such change in concept and conception can help initiate a desirable and effective society and nation. Educated minds help illuminate new paths and options for a better and bolder society. Moreover, education induces rational thinking, consistency, independence and self-determination in an individual’s personality. Education undoubtedly plays a central role in societal change, but to strengthen and secure our community, we must educate our women. Therefore, we must push our society to end the barriers faced by women, who struggle for their education and learning.

A society with better educated women prospers more than one with illiterate and less intellectual women. When 10% of girls go to school, the country’s GDP increases by an average of 3%, while keeping girls out of school costs a country millions. Educated women with a college education tend to get better paying jobs, have better job choices, more work privileges. Consequently, they reinvest more in their families and communities, which breaks the chain of poverty. while uneducated and illiterate women do not benefit from these beneficial factors and continue to face poverty and misery.

Every woman is much stronger and more capable than she thinks. A woman with power and education can not only thrive but can also conquer the world with her abilities. By supporting each other, we can help someone prosper. If Pakistan ends the gender gap in education and succeeds in achieving the goal of educating and empowering Pakistani women, then together as a nation we can exploit failures and weaknesses of our country, but we must also change ourselves first, by getting rid of rigorous mentalities and rituals and by promoting the education of women and giving every woman her right to an education

Education is empowering and also builds self-confidence in women. They have a better understanding of their rights, their roles and a healthy lifestyle. An educated woman finally knows how she can effectively use her freedom beneficially and constructively by reaching all her abilities. Education helps women discover some of their main qualities and skills. Educated women are more aware of the conditions and suffering around them and are more likely to step forward to improve and strengthen them.

Through education, women prefer to speak out on their own, can present strong evidence of the decisions they have made, and can oppose, resist, and speak out against domestic violence and sexual abuse, and are less likely to complain. be subjected to such violence. While uneducated women are more exposed to this violence and can barely speak out against abuse and are less aware of facing and responding to such violence.

Educated women typically marry four years later than their estimated age at marriage and have fewer children, somewhat reducing rapid population growth. These women are less likely to die in pregnancy, give birth to healthy children, and are more concerned about their family’s health, such as their nutrition and vaccinations, so their children are less likely to die of preventable diseases. or malnutrition.

The role of an educated woman as a mother is no greater than any other. An educated mother can edify the minds of future generations. They can provide more confidence and support to their children, making them more aware of the world and their surroundings. Educated mothers are more likely to promote their children’s education, can raise their children better, participate more in decision-making in their homes, and have better planning and understanding of future consequences. But when it comes to uneducated mothers, they have a higher death rate during pregnancy, give birth to sick children, usually give birth to more than three children, have no knowledge of health and treatments, while their babies are less likely to receive a full course of vaccinations and suffer from malnutrition that prevents them from surviving. Over the past four decades, the global increase in female education has averted more than four million child deaths. Uneducated women hardly think about the education and future of their children.

Now is the time for real social transformation

President Ramaphosa’s State of the Nation address left me, like many others, excited and hopeful. There was a sense of possibility in the air, the possibility of a better future. It was wonderful to enjoy these moments after such a long period of pessimism. It was a relief when President Ramaphosa approached civil society as a partner and transformed the previously rather hostile attitude of the government into one of partnership and collaboration. I can only imagine the masses of emails the Presidency has received from civil society organizations committing to partnership and offering their area of ​​expertise and methodology in support of the President’s call.

South African civil society is a diverse and large sector with over 85,000 registered NPOs. The common denominator is, in large part, the improvement of conditions in society. Yet it appears that the impact towards transformative change in South Africa is small. It doesn’t take much to realize that over 350 years of oppression and deliberate dehumanization have brought South Africa to where it is, with the current state apparatus captured and eroded by capitalist and rapacious individuals. And of course, since last week, the hope of walking on a new path.

While the renewal of political leadership after the Zuma years is important, the task before us is not their responsibility alone. As much as we all admire the new president and the expected changes he must bring, I think we need honest conversations within civil society about the massive resources (human, financial and social) that make up this sector, d on the one hand, and the lack of transformative change on the other. The development industry is booming globally and in South Africa. TED talks, webinars, new ICT solutions, fundraising seminars, development consultants and a growing number of NPOs are part of the new normal.

If the time is right, I think the conversation about change needs to start by differentiating between development and transformation. Development is the global paradigm for change. If we take the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, the World Bank Development Indicators, the African Union Agenda or South Africa’s National Development Plan, they all speak to the development paradigm. What the concept of development seems to imply is that there is a certain direction for change, apparently reinforcing strategies and programs that seem very similar across the world to achieve the desired results of growth and development.

Social transformation is a less popular and difficult term because it speaks of deep, complete and radical change. He talks about disrupting, interrupting and restarting. He challenges us to think upside down and upside down. It requires brutal honesty and clarity. South Africa desperately needs transformation to fight centuries of institutionalized oppression and dehumanization.

In the South African context, this requires deliberate acts to counter ongoing historical injustices, captured and corrupt state institutions and actively participate in building a transformed society. Even though the President has promised that under this leadership, state capture will be eradicated, we must push and be vigilant. Social transformation is the prerogative of citizens and needs a servant and effective state to support it, the one that was promised by President Ramaphosa during SONA.

The state should simply play a service role on the agenda of the citizen of this country. A separate transformation from development is also vital to ensure that this transformational project will not be captured by Western or capitalist ideas of development and the belief that resources and dressing up a problem or band-aid will provide the solution. While foreign companies or governments may hold the resources and funding for a transformational agenda, it should be clear from the outset that they can participate, join and enable the process, but never own or determine the results.

What it requires is to work for a country and, ultimately, a continent that offers the possibilities of a dignified life for all. It means a country where no one is discriminated against because of their race, color, sex or beliefs and where everyone has the freedom to access opportunities. This means not repeating cycles of poverty, but focusing on innovation and building bold solutions. This will require going against the mainstream approaches of mainstream philanthropic or development institutions.

Moving towards a transformational agenda, which puts decency and dignity at the center, will enable human possibility or, in other words, ensure that each person can walk high in their own stature. This will require a commitment to focus on quality, sustainability, excellence and efficiency. It will also require being bold and creating innovative, world-class interventions. The protection of territories and the single thought of their perpetuation cannot be authorized.

The vision that civil society must have is to activate social transformation by designing bold, world-class solutions that understand the complexity and intersectional nature of the problems to be solved. DM

Carolin Gomulia is Head of Strategy and Fundraising and Communications and Advocacy at the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation.

The social transformation of Cambodia, 30 years after the Paris Peace Accords

30 years have passed since the signing of the Paris Peace Accords. If it is a person, this person must become an adult who can be responsible for his own destiny with full working energy. It’s a long journey for Cambodia and the path has not been easy.

This article proposes to raise some observations on certain aspects of social transformations since the Paris peace agreements that local populations have witnessed in their daily lives.

First, safety and security. In the 1990s, many foreigners wrote about Cambodia’s “culture of violence” and attributed it to the Khmer Rouge tragedy and seemingly endless civil wars. Elderly Khmers like to use the word “Cham Srok San Tran”, meaning to wait for the nation to become peaceful and quiet. It seemed like an impossible dream for them as they experienced endless wars. Many of them had experienced up to five different political systems and ideologies in their lifetimes and much of the political transition still involved bloodshed. Cambodia is the real university of experiments in political ideology, in their harshest and most cruel forms.

In the 1990s, armed robberies and shootings were commonplace, killing lives on the streets in broad daylight. We used to see groups of bodyguards on Nighthawk motorbikes carrying AK47s all over Phnom Penh. Kidnappings for ransom have appeared in the news from time to time. Honda Dream 100 motorcycles were so popular back then among people and also among armed robbers. Weapons were easily accessible. People even shot at the sky when it was raining. Traveling late at night or too early in the morning meant risking lives. Traveling across provinces was difficult both in terms of logistics and security. There have even been train robberies. Mine explosions were also the usual headlines that people didn’t seem to care about anymore.

Today, it is a huge difference in terms of everyday life for people. Now people can go out to exercise at 5 a.m. in public parks or go drinking late at night without fear of gun violence as long as they follow the rules of the road. Safety to travel from provinces with better road access is something people take for granted, and past insecurity is long forgotten.

Secondly, the management and the climate of the elections are improving a little.

For the general perception of the Cambodian people, election means unrest. Election can also mean instability. During the election period, food prices rose as people tried to secure their stocks in the event of instability, chaos or violence. Economic activities, investment plan, real estate purchases, etc., everything was to be suspended until after the election.

After the election, there was still a long-running political stalemate, protests over voting irregularities, demonstrations and street violence. Some wealthy people often evacuated their family members abroad until the political situation calmed down.

Today, in recent elections, with the digitization of the voters list, accusations of voting irregularities have been significantly reduced. Nevertheless, the fear of chaos remains, although not as high as in the 1990s or early 2000s. This is how democracy is adapting in Cambodia. There is no simple answer or easy way to do it, but surely all of society needs gradual adaptation, and probably trial and error on the way to the peaceful consolidation of liberal democracy. multiparty as enshrined in the Constitution. Peace and stability is not something to play or bet with political games. The mentality of fear among the general Cambodian people about political chaos during the election period is still a social feature within Cambodian politics that is struggling to fade, at least in the near future.

Third, better pay and better jobs. In the 1990s, the salary of civil servants was extremely low, and it was always late for months or sometimes missed. There weren’t many types of jobs in the private sector you could dream of. The economy of the 1990s was an NGO economy and an aid industry.

Now teachers, the armed forces and civil servants are better paid. It’s not luxury but it’s paid for regularly now and you have to admit the significant change from the 1990s.

Today, the economy is moving towards a commercial economy, more diversified industries, high-end tourism, not just for backpackers, increased development of financial industry, real estate and construction. Jobs for younger generations are more diverse; more STEM-related jobs. There are more universities, more scholarships, and young people have more overseas exposure, triggering domestic ambition to catch up and compete with the region.

Fourth, the social media revolution. Facebook is an agent of change in Cambodian politics and society. People often say they’re more afraid of Facebook than the police. People can complain directly to the Prime Minister if they face injustices. It’s hard to hide any controversy when people have smart phones and the Internet. And almost all Cambodian adults with a regular salary have smart phones with internet. Also, the internet is cheap. Information becomes more and more abundant that it becomes extremely difficult to conceal social controversies or problems affecting the public interest. You can access any news source you want to hear, read or on Facebook, like, dislike or share.

Fifth, a gradual transition to social security and protection. It is a historic milestone that the government has started using the national budget for social security and protection in recent years. This is probably the future trajectory of Cambodia’s socio-economic development.

When you have jobs, people worry that if they get sick? What would be the future of their children after their retirement or their loss of working capacity? What if they have to sell their land or property to pay for health care? Could they survive on a pension or how would the private sector do without a pension? Is there affordable health insurance with reliable medical care? Is there a hospital in the country that people can count on?

Civil servants, workers in the private sector or in civil society organizations, they all share the same concern for the future, for their work, their lives and the safety of children. Making people feel more secure and inclusive for the future is the next social evolution that Cambodia is heading towards. Although Cambodia is still at the initial stage in terms of security and social protection, the dream and the actions are there. So there should be hope and optimism for Cambodia as it marches towards a safer, more secure and more inclusive future for all.

Is 30 years long enough for us all to look back to see what Cambodia has been through? What did Cambodia do wrong? And what did Cambodia do well? There are many ways to appreciate social change, but at least as it stands, it’s fair to say that Cambodia is moving in the right direction as it reflects on its dark, tragic past.

There is hope and there is a bright future for Cambodia as a nation.

  • Keywords: Cambodia, Paris Peace Accords

Creativity, Arts and Social Transformation (CAST) Program

Creativity, Arts and Social Transformation (CAST):

Learn more about creating art. Learn to harness the power of community. Collaborate with teams of people from diverse backgrounds and disciplines. Become aware of yourself as a listener and listen with qualities of presence that elicit difficult stories to tell. Identify sources of resilience.

Become a CAST miner. Check out the CAST miner projects that came before.

  • Anna Cass ’21 – Project: ‘Voices of Comedy’ – the production of a multi-event program that brought together comedians from diverse backgrounds for a show and workshops at Brandeis.

  • Rasheed headshot

    Rasheed Peters ’20 – Project: “At the Heart of it All” – a video and monologue reflecting Rasheed’s work as a storyteller.

  • Photo by Haia

    Haia R’nana Bchiri ’20 – Project: “Comfort: Food” – a book of poetry and recipes associated with a thesis on mother-daughter relationships and the role of theater in the Western family structure.

  • Zoe standing with her arms crossed

    Zoë Rose ’20 – Project: “Zoë Rose Spills Her Guts” – a solo show about exploring identity.

  • Aviva sitting outside against a brick wall

    Aviva Davis ’21 – Project: Hosting monthly Zoom Conversations featuring a different Jewish Creator of Color each month to shine a spotlight on the diversity of the Jewish community and address the microaggressions that Jews of Color face in their lives everyday life.

CAST commitments, in solidarity with Black Lives Matter

The interdisciplinary Creativity, Arts, and Social Transformation (CAST) program condemns white supremacy, anti-black violence, police brutality, the school-to-prison pipeline, and the many additional daily violence against black people in through which individuals, groups, and institutions in the United States perpetuate and profit from the legacy of slavery. Read more.

Jaime Black in a red dress in the forest under the snow

Photo credit: Jaime Black

Jaime Black | between us

November 9, 2021- February 25, 2022
Kniznick Gallery

Hosted by CAST Chair, Dr. Toni Shapiro-Phim

Water. Rock. Twigs. Body. The Red color. These elements appear throughout Jaime Black’s exhibition, between us, honoring the interconnectedness between humanity and the natural and spiritual worlds. The artist, of mixed Anishinaabe and Finnish ancestry, pays particular attention to the power of Indigenous women in all of these areas as nurturers, trust builders, holders and givers of knowledge.

Learn more…

On this Children’s Day, meet young people leading the way in social transformation | APN News

Previous story:

World Diabetes Day: SEHA provides world-class preventive services to diabetes patients

Next story:

Ujala Cygnus Group of Hospitals Unveils Wellness Package on World Diabetes Day

On this Children’s Day, meet young people who are paving the way for social transformation

Posted on November 13, 2021

  • Teach For India is celebrating Children’s Day week from November 14-20 to highlight the good work of young leaders of change across the country.
  • Among Chennai’s success stories are young girls mitigating flood risk in the city and tackling alcoholism in local communities.

Hyderabad – “The children of today will make the India of tomorrow. How we raise them will determine the future of the country,” said Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, whose birthday the country celebrates as Children’s Day. As part of National Child Day, which falls on November 14, Teach For India, in collaboration with Kids Education Revolution, is celebrating Children’s Day week from November 14-20, to bring out stories student leadership across the country.

With over 4,000 Teach For India alumni reaching over 33 million children, or 1 in 10 children in India, the organization identifies children who stand out as agents of change, taking initiatives to different levels of the system, from schools to communities to governance and politics. As India faces its own challenges on many socio-economic and environmental fronts, its youth offer a ray of hope.

Here are two young leaders from Hyderabad who are making a difference to an environmental and social issue in their own way:

  1. Bharat Kumar – Meet Bharat Kumar from Khushbow Vidya Niketan in Hyderabad, who strives to change people’s mindsets in order to clean up and maintain his school and community. By creating a magnetic trash can out of recycled materials and educating others about the consequences of littering, he hopes to make a positive difference in his environment. His journey so far has taught him an important lesson: if we take initiative, we will inevitably see results.
  • Safoora Siddiqua – A grade 8 student from Hyderabad replicated the Indian parliamentary system in her school in an effort to develop leadership skills in her peers. They worked to transfer all responsibility for running the school to this student body. Safoora, who was elected prime minister, worked with her “ministers” on responsibilities such as curriculum monitoring, notebook corrections, event management and discipline management.
  • Anil S – A grade 8 student from Hyderabad, used sport as a way to break gender stereotypes in his community. He started a project called Ultimate Frisbee, where he trained 100 kids from his school and community to give equal opportunities to girls and boys. He even organized “Spirit Circles”, a space for reflection that players can engage in after their session, to share their experiences and feedback on the game. They are currently the best team in Hyderabad and work for competitions in Chennai and Bengaluru.